Oh boy, bush is just wonderful!

[taikuchin]

Originally Posted by saxonburgcruiser

Difference being that YOU believe GWB lied...that is your OPINION. It is not a PROVEN fact. Many believe he did not lie.
On the other hand, Bill Clinton did lie. That is a proven fact.

Yea, Bill lied & most people don't give a crap. In fact most normal red blooded American men would have done the same under the circumstances.
Dubya & his crew did lie & are still lying almost every time they open their mouths...latest: Dubya said last week he wasn't in a meeting with Clark on 9/12. This week the story is changed. Are you keeping track.?

[BlueMeanie]

Originally Posted by taikuchin

Yea, Bill lied & most people don't give a crap. In fact most normal red blooded American men would have done the same under the circumstances.
Dubya & his crew did lie & are still lying almost every time they open their mouths...latest: Dubya said last week he wasn't in a meeting with Clark on 9/12. This week the story is changed. Are you keeping track.?

Really... How many times have you cheated on your wife?

Dan

[taikuchin]

Originally Posted by BlueMeanie

Really... How many times have you cheated on your wife?

Dan

As many times as you've done your mother.

[lisa]

Originally Posted by OC Cruzer

Maybe I am incorrect, but it sounds like you are saying, in some of your posts, that because G. Bush may have had a drug and/or drinking problem 3 decades ago and that he was arrested for DUI 3 decades ago, he does not deserve to be President, and it should be used as a reason not to vote for him.
I believe alot of good people at some point get knocked down in life.
What's important is, do they get back up and do they have the strength of character to stay up.

---------------------------------

The difference in my view is FELONY possession. In my world, felons can't even vote much less hold office.

[lisa]

Originally Posted by satellite66

Lisa I realize that nothing you see that is positive about Bush or the war will alter your thinking. You want to believe the best about Clinton and his intentions and the worst about Bush. It really amazes me that a rational adult is giving more consideration to a murderous dictator than to the President of the US. This guy killed hundreds of thousands of his own citizens but you want to believe that he never had WMDs or would use them against the US.
You keep calling Bush a liar but remember who was disbarred for perjury. Who lied to the American people for 8 months about his relationship with Monica?

Why does everyone here think I am defending clinton? I did not like what clinton did much of the time either, but he is not a spoiled daddy's boy who (like the kennedys) got off scott free for his actions. Daddy's money and power are the only reason he is where he is-no republican will cop to it, though-sad!!! They really get cranky if you tell them (truthfully) that daddy is the only reason he was DETERMINED to make 9/11 Iraq's fault.

[OC Cruzer]

Originally Posted by lisa

They really get cranky if you tell them (truthfully) that daddy is the only reason he was DETERMINED to make 9/11 Iraq's fault.

I thought our immediate response to 9-11 was to attack terrorists in Afghanistan.
If Bush is trying to make 9-11 Iraq's fault, why did we go to Afghanistan first.
Sounds to me like he had his priorities straight.

It ALSO sounds like President Bush's strong response to 9-11, STOPPED other planned attacks.

http://www.washtimes.com/world/20040...0655-9785r.htm

Guess the terrorists expected the typical bill clinton response, lob in a few cruise missles and forget it.
Wonder how Al Gore would have handled it.

So, Lisa,
Would you like to credit President Bush's strong and decisive response to the events of 9-11 for stopping further attacks on our soil ? ? ?

No, of course not


-------------------------------------

[lisa]

Originally Posted by OC Cruzer

Would you like to credit President Bush's strong and decisive response to the events of 9-11 for stopping further attacks on our soil ? ? ?

No, of course not


-------------------------------------

I do not find bush either strong, or decisive. He cannot even read an intelligence report and see what it says-you know, when his intelligence/security advisors said Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 and he said go back and find a way to link them so I can spank saddam.

[Dreamacre]

Originally Posted by lisa

I can spank saddam.

Kinky!

[taikuchin]

[quote=OC Cruzer]I


Would you like to credit President Bush's strong and decisive response to the events of 9-11 for stopping further attacks on our soil ? ? ?

QUOTE]

It was the response of the US Military that stopped further attacks (Bill Clinton's military)...dubya's response was to run & hide in Nebraska. He has a record of hiding from conflicts. The attack on Iraq has done nothing to stop attacks & in fact is responsible for increasing attacks on our troops & citizens. 600 soldiers DEAD for a pack of lies.

[JOEM]

Originally Posted by lisa

Why does everyone here think I am defending clinton? I did not like what clinton did much of the time either, but he is not a spoiled daddy's boy who (like the kennedys) got off scott free for his actions. Daddy's money and power are the only reason he is where he is-no republican will cop to it, though-sad!!! They really get cranky if you tell them (truthfully) that daddy is the only reason he was DETERMINED to make 9/11 Iraq's fault.

Because you're constantly defending Clinton and your negative comments are exclusively leveled at President Bush (BTW, he led us to war against the Taliband first as a direct reaction to 9-11). You do not come off as bi-partisan at all. That's why. And if Clinton wasn't a spoiled kid who got off scott-free after stenuously avoiding the draft...then you have the straightest chrome luggage rack ever issued.